No other politician living today is capable of engendering this type of response from the American people. Wouldn’t be great to have a president the people admire? We can.


Pentagon room shocker: members in the Pentagon Press Room were carrying on a candid conversation while waiting for Obama to appear to discuss war strategies. Unfortunately for them, camera’s and microphones were rolling all through out their candid conversation, catching them in the midst of a very telling dialogue concerning a potential Ron Paul presidency.

One man is overhead saying to his colleague:

“See this room – 2/3 of us laid off when Ron Paul is president.”

This little sentence is causing quite a stir, as it demonstrates how government and Pentagon officials are more concerned about their jobs, than the killing of millions of innocent people overseas, and the trillions of American taxpayers it all costs.

The picture of why the media refuses to acknowledge Ron Paul becomes clearer everyday – his sound principles and the protection of human life threatens the government that lives off the immorality of death, destruction, and theft. This is what America has become.


Ron Paul wins Iowa

Had voting in the Iowa Republican caucuses been restricted to voters under the age of 40, Rep. Ron Paul of Texas would have won easily, according to an entrance poll published by CNN.

By contrast, according to the poll, former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania won among voters between 40 and 64, while former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney won among voters 65 or older.

Voters at the caucuses tended to be older citizens, according to the poll, with fully 60 percent of them being at least 50 years of age.

Only 25 percent of the caucus-goers were under 40, and only 15 percent were under 30.

Paul’s support in the caususes was strongest among the very youngest voters. Among caucus-goers 17 to 24, who made up 10 percent of voters, Paul took 50 percent of the vote. Santorum ran second in this age bracket, taking 21 percent, followed by Romney at 13 percent, Texas Gov. Rick Perry at 8 percent, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich at 5 percent, and Rep. Michele Bachman at 1 percent.

Among caucus-goers 25 to 29, who made up only 5 percent of voters, Paul won 45 percent, Santorum placed second with 27 percent, Romney took third with 12 percent, followed by Perry at 7 percent, and Gingrich and Bachmann at 4 percent each.

In the 30-to-39 age bracket, which made up 10 percent of caucus-goers, Paul took 34 percent, Santorum took 30 percent, Romney took 17 percent, Gingrich took 12 percent, Perry took 4 percent, and Bachmann took 2 percent.

Read More: CNSNews.com


“[I]f the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery.”

“If Darwin is right, I have organized my life around an illusion. We have no moral demands if we are evolved.”

Turns out, despite Rick Santorum’s self proclaimed rigid family values, he actively aided and abetted a political friend involved in an extramarital affair…

From Politico:

It wasn’t immediately clear why Hampton sought help from Santorum, a former Senate colleague of Ensign’s. Hampton had previously suggested that Santorum got wind of his email to Kelly by virtue of his position at Fox News, but the ethics report says Hampton contacted Santorum directly.

The same night that Santorum reportedly tipped him off, Ensign held an hours-long staff meeting and disclosed that he had an affair with Cynthia Hampton, which was soon followed by a public apology in Las Vegas.


The NDAA is the most blatant violation of your rights as a human being and citizen of America. The video above provides footage showing Mitt Romney and Ron Paul’s stance on the NDAA bill, and their sense of urgency in protecting your life and liberty.

After watching the video below, would knowing Mitt Romney’s stance on the NDAA really matter?


Ron Paul trumps Santorum

To the Iowa Caucus, America: the following is a letter to you, written by Rick Santorum’s nephew, John Garver.

If you want another big-government politician who supports the status quo to run our country, you should vote for my uncle, Rick Santorum. America is based on a strong belief in individual liberty. My uncle’s interventionist policies, both domestic and foreign, stem from his irrational fear of freedom not working.

It is not the government’s job to dictate to individuals how they must live. The Constitution was designed to protect individual liberty. My Uncle Rick cannot fathom a society in which people cooperate and work with each other freely. When Republicans were spending so much money under President Bush, my uncle was right there along with them as a senator. The reason we have so much debt is not only because of Democrats, but also because of big-spending Republicans like my Uncle Rick.

It is because of this inability of status quo politicians to recognize the importance of our individual liberties that I have been drawn to Ron Paul. Unlike my uncle, he does not believe that the American people are incapable of forming decisions. He believes that an individual is more powerful than any group (a notion our founding fathers also believed in).

Another important reason I support Ron Paul is his position on foreign policy. He is the only candidate willing to bring our troops home, not only from the Middle East, but from around the world.

Ron Paul seems to be the only candidate trying to win the election for a reason other than simply winning the election.

This year, I’ll vote for an honest change in our government. I’ll vote for real hope. I’ll vote for a real leader. This year, I will vote for Ron Paul.

John Garver is a 19-year-old student at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown. John is a strong supporter of Ron Paul despite his love for family member Rick Santorum.

Source: Daily Caller


I knew Mitt was a serial flip flopper, but boy does it look bad when you see all of his flipping in one consecutive video. Mitt is a sharp looking guy, no doubt about it – but at the core, he is simply a man that yearns for the popularity and power of a political post, and is willing to take any stance that will get your vote. There isn’t a single principle that Mitt stands on – or perhaps more appropriately – Mitt believes in whatever principle will get you to like him at this very moment. It could literally change next year, or tomorrow, or within the next 2 minutes, just as it has before. Mitt isn’t even so much a human being, as he is a walking mirror. He will reflect back to you whatever you believe in, which is great when he’s in front of you, however not so great when he’s in front of that other person who thinks they have a right to your money, your children, your house.

So who really is Mitt Romney? It’s quite literally impossible to say. The only thing for certain – Mitt is a serial a flip flopper. Nominate this man for anything, and you’re bound to get burned.


Latest statistics show Ron Paul continues to trump all GOP candidates in terms of user google searches. Media references remain out of touch with the interest of US citizens – though the chart shows a recent increase in Ron Paul’s media references as a result of their latest, though largely unsuccessful attempts to convince people he is a racist.


At a recent Romney for President event in Council Bluffs, Iowa, Iraq combat veteran Adam Kokesh was hoping to ask Mitt Romney some very important questions. As soon as Romney’s campaign identified the microphone in Adam Kokesh’s hand, his security team instituted some type of Operation: Avoid The War Veteran With Tough Constitution Questions. The ensuing silliness was all caught on camera. After Mitt’s incredibly disingenuous speech, which ended up just being a poorly acted recitation of “that wonderful hymn, O beautiful, for spacious skies,” his security team acted swiftly to ensure Mitt Romney avoided the mundane citizens waiting to shake his hand or ask questions upon his exit. There was a relocation of his campaign bus to a nearby parking garage, and several decoy Chevy Tahoes strategically placed for Mitt to make a clean escape past the US citizens and the “war heroes,” who not moments before Romney claimed were the very heroes that his beautiful hymn was dedicated to. An important and revealing image of who this man really is. I hope America can see past his delicately coiffed hair.

Here is a partial transcript of what must be one of the most shallow and disingenuous speeches I’ve ever seen from a Presidential Candidate:

(editor’s challenge: I challenge you to find a single, specific, irreducible principle that Mitt Romney is campaigning on.)

This is the best part of my campaign, you can’t imagine.
I never imagined that I would be running for President of the United States,
I sort of backed in to getting involved in politics.
I, I’ve been governor for four years, only four years!
I love this country!
I love the principles upon which it was founded.
This is an election of a choice in direction for America,
Not just policies, but a choice of whether we’re going to remain true
to the principles that made us who we are,
Or instead we’re going to take a sharp turn left, and become something
that we would hardly recognize.

We gotta go to the national parks!
What a thrill that was!
I knew what mom and dad were doing,
They wanted us to fall in love with America, and it worked.
That wonderful hymn I already mentioned,
‘O beautiful, for spacious skies, for amber waves of grain…”
If corn counts as an amber wave of grain, why you have some right here!
The song goes on, you know, in another verse,
‘O beautiful for heroes proved in liberating strife,’
Do we have any service men or women in the audience,
would you raise your hand if you’re in the audience.
Thank you.
These are who the song refers to.

Here are Mitt Romney’s Stances on the Constitution in the Past:


Obama signs NDAA Into Law Obama signs NDAA Into Law

President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) today, allowing indefinite detention to be codified into law – perhaps the most blatantly unconstitutional law instituted by the White House in recent years. As you know, the White House had threatened to veto an earlier version of the NDAA but reversed course shortly before Congress voted on the final bill. While President Obama issued a signing statement saying he had “serious reservations” about the provisions, the statement only applies to how his administration would use it and would not affect how the law is interpreted by subsequent administrations.

The statute is particularly dangerous because it has no temporal or geographic limitations, and can be used by this and future presidents to militarily detain people captured far from any battlefield.

View more from ACLU at the source link below.

Source: ACLU


Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!